Start with the distribution. Find the sign that separates the two plausible sites, then examine for it. A defensible broad localisation is more useful than a confident eponym that does not fit.
Anatomical figures sit beside the relevant patterns. Use Enlarge ↗ for labels, then + to zoom. The pictures are embedded for offline use; credits and clinical caveats sit below each one.
Sudden focal deficit: glucose, last known well, stroke escalation and urgent brain / vascular imaging through the local pathway. Record a baseline NIHSS and the disabling deficit; a low score, isolated hand weakness or a normal early CT does not exclude stroke. New diplopia, dysphagia, severe imbalance or bilateral signs can be posterior circulation disease.
New bladder / perineal change with leg symptoms; a sensory level; rapidly progressive weakness: urgent senior assessment for cord / cauda equina pathology and emergency MRI as indicated. Bulbar or respiratory weakness, falling consciousness, or a new third-nerve palsy: immediate escalation.
[1] [2] [3] [7] [27] [45] [46]Establish onset and progression, then map face, arm, leg and trunk. Compare both sides. Language, visual fields, eye movements, reflexes and the plantar response often change the localisation.
| Feature | UMN pattern | LMN pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Tone / reflexes | Spasticity, brisk reflexes, clonus; extensor plantar | Reduced tone / reflexes in the affected arc; wasting and fasciculations may develop |
| Distribution | Pyramidal pattern; loss of fine movement; may include face | Root, nerve or anterior-horn pattern; compare muscles individually |
| Important exception | Acute stroke / cord injury can be flaccid and hyporeflexic. | Normal reflexes do not exclude mild neuropathy; reflex loss alone does not identify the cause. |
UMN = upper motor neurone; LMN = lower motor neurone; NMJ = neuromuscular junction. Ipsilateral = same side as the lesion; contralateral = opposite side. Roman numerals denote cranial nerves.
All deficits below are relative to the lesion side. Vascular territories overlap; the examination suggests a territory, while CTA/MRA and brain imaging establish the vascular lesion.
ACA: medial leg area is mostly hidden here. MCA: lateral face / arm and language or attention networks. PCA: occipital visual cortex. The coloured territories are approximate.
Frank Gaillard, based on Patrick J. Lynch. Original / source. CC BY-SA 3.0. Resized / rendered for display; anatomical content unchanged.
Medial frontal / parietal cortex → leg-predominant ACA pattern. Posterior medial occipital cortex → PCA visual pattern. Surface maps do not show the deep perforator territories.
Fred the Oyster, after Frank Gaillard and Patrick J. Lynch. Original / source. CC BY-SA 3.0. Resized / rendered for display; anatomical content unchanged.
| Likely site / territory | Pattern that points there | Useful discriminator / trap |
|---|---|---|
| MCA, superior division Lateral frontal | Contralateral face / arm weakness > leg; dominant side: effortful, non-fluent aphasia. | Test comprehension and repetition. Destructive frontal eye-field lesion often causes gaze towards the lesion. |
| MCA, inferior division Temporoparietal | Dominant: fluent but impaired comprehension; non-dominant: neglect. Contralateral field deficit; weakness may be slight. | Do not confuse fluent aphasia with confusion. Neglect is an attentional deficit, not simply a visual-field cut. |
| Proximal MCA / ICA | Combined motor, sensory, gaze, field and language / attention abnormalities. | Severe cortical syndrome suggests a large territory; the exact occlusion requires vascular imaging. |
| ACA Medial frontal / parietal | Contralateral leg-predominant weakness / sensory loss; abulia, impaired initiation; sometimes incontinence. | Marked arm–face involvement suggests extension or another site. Bilateral lesions may cause akinetic mutism. |
| PCA Occipital / medial temporal | Contralateral homonymous field loss; memory disturbance if medial temporal involved. | Dominant occipital + splenial lesion: alexia without agraphia. Thalamic / midbrain involvement adds other signs. |
| Internal capsule / corona radiata | Contralateral motor ± sensory deficit; often dense face–arm–leg weakness without obvious cortical signs. | Motor fibres are compact. A small lesion can produce substantial weakness. |
| Anterior choroidal | Contralateral weakness, sensory loss and homonymous field loss; the full combination is often incomplete. | Internal-capsule and visual-pathway involvement; hemiparesis may dominate. |
| Thalamus | Contralateral face–body sensory loss; sometimes ataxia, altered alertness, language / attention change. | Pain may develop later. Bilateral paramedian injury can cause somnolence, amnesia and vertical gaze disturbance. |
| Watershed | Border-zone injury: proximal limb weakness, language or higher-function deficits depending on distribution. | Bilateral ACA–MCA injury can produce disproportionate shoulder / arm weakness. Hypoperfusion and embolism can contribute. |
| Vertebrobasilar / cerebellar | Diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, vertigo / ataxia; crossed signs, bilateral weakness or impaired consciousness. | Posterior stroke can be disabling with few NIHSS points. See brainstem and ataxia. |
Describe the language deficit before naming the aphasia. Test spontaneous speech, naming, a command that cannot be guessed, repetition, reading and writing. Check hearing, attention and premorbid language.
| Speech / language pattern | Typical localisation | Bedside distinction |
|---|---|---|
| Non-fluent; comprehension relatively better; poor repetition | Dominant frontal / perisylvian network; Broca pattern | Short, effortful phrases; complex grammar may still be difficult. |
| Fluent; poor comprehension and repetition | Dominant posterior perisylvian network; Wernicke pattern | Normal rhythm does not imply meaningful language. |
| Fluent; comprehension relatively preserved; repetition disproportionately poor | Dominant dorsal language network; conduction pattern | Use a short phrase, then a longer sentence. |
| Markedly reduced output and comprehension | Extensive dominant language-network injury; global pattern | Exclude reduced arousal or severe hearing / attention impairment. |
| Repetition relatively preserved despite other language deficits | Transcortical pattern; frontal or posterior network disconnection | Describe the profile; repetition alone does not identify one artery. |
| Slurred articulation with intact naming / comprehension | Dysarthria; cortical, subcortical, brainstem, cerebellar or neuromuscular | Dysarthria alone is a poor anatomical localiser. |
Read these as the patient’s visual world, not a face-on eye examination. Homonymous loss affects the same side of space in both eyes. Test each eye separately; acuity and attention still matter.
ClinicalReference schematic. Anatomy: [8] [10] [11]. Simplified for bedside lookup.
| Finding | Likely site | Check / caveat |
|---|---|---|
| Monocular visual loss | Retina / optic nerve, anterior to chiasm | Acuity, colour, pupils / RAPD, fundus. Sudden retinal ischaemia needs urgent assessment. |
| Bitemporal field loss | Optic chiasm | Test each eye separately; consider sellar / suprasellar disease. |
| Homonymous field loss | Contralateral retrochiasmal pathway | Same side of visual space in both eyes. A right field loss localises to the left pathway. |
| Superior homonymous quadrant | Often contralateral temporal optic radiation (Meyer loop) | Quadrant patterns are suggestive, not perfectly specific. |
| Inferior homonymous quadrant | Often contralateral parietal optic radiation | Look for neglect, sensory extinction and other parietal signs. |
| Congruous homonymous hemianopia | Often contralateral occipital cortex; other retrochiasmal sites possible | Macular sparing supports but does not prove an occipital site. |
Neglect / extinction: commonly non-dominant, usually right, attention network. Astereognosis / agraphesthesia: contralateral parietal association cortex only if primary sensation, attention and comprehension are adequate. Apraxia: impaired learned action despite sufficient strength and comprehension, often dominant parietofrontal network.
ANZ assessment check: assess acuity with the patient’s glasses, fields and ocular alignment / movements. Screen communication; arrange formal specialist assessment when impaired. Suspected neglect warrants assessment with validated tools, even if a brief bedside screen seems reassuring. A language or field deficit is a rehabilitation and safety issue as well as a localising sign.
Use the cranial-nerve sign to suggest a level, then check the nearby motor / sensory pathways. This is a level map: nuclei, fascicles and vascular supply are more complex than the boxes.
ClinicalReference schematic. Anatomy: [12] [13]. Simplified for bedside lookup.
| Site / familiar name | Characteristic combination | What separates it |
|---|---|---|
| Lateral medulla Wallenberg; vertebral / PICA territory | Ipsilateral facial pain–temperature loss, ataxia / Horner; contralateral body pain–temperature loss; vertigo, dysphagia, hoarse voice. | Nucleus ambiguus involvement gives swallowing / voice signs. Limb power may be preserved. Not every case has every feature. |
| Medial medulla | Ipsilateral XII weakness + contralateral limb weakness and vibration / joint-position loss. | Tongue may deviate towards the lesion on protrusion. Facial movement often spared. |
| Lateral caudal pons AICA territory | Ipsilateral whole-face weakness, vestibular / auditory symptoms and ataxia; crossed pain–temperature findings may occur. | New hearing loss with continuous vertigo can be vascular. An abnormal head impulse does not rule out AICA stroke. |
| Medial / dorsal pons | Ipsilateral VI fascicular palsy or horizontal gaze palsy; contralateral weakness if corticospinal tract involved. | VI nerve / fascicle: one eye cannot abduct. VI nucleus: both eyes cannot gaze towards that side. |
| Ventral midbrain Weber pattern | Ipsilateral III palsy + contralateral hemiparesis. | Additional ataxia / tremor suggests tegmental structures; do not force an eponym. |
| Basilar territory | May present with hemiparesis, rather than tetraparesis. More extensive injury can give bilateral long-tract / cranial-nerve signs or impaired consciousness. | Do not require bilateral signs before vascular imaging. Extensive ventral pontine injury can produce locked-in syndrome: quadriplegia / anarthria, awareness and often vertical gaze / blinking preserved; seek communication. |
A cranial-nerve palsy can arise in the nucleus, fascicle, subarachnoid space, skull base, orbit or peripheral nerve. A brainstem localisation becomes stronger when neighbouring pathways are also affected.
Name INO by the side of the failed adduction. Here that is the left MLF. A III palsy or myasthenia can mimic part of the pattern; use the rest of the examination.
ClinicalReference schematic. Anatomy: [13] [14] [15]. Simplified for bedside lookup.
| Eye-movement finding | Localisation | Confirm / trap |
|---|---|---|
| III palsy: ptosis; impaired adduction, elevation / depression; often down-and-out eye | Ipsilateral III nerve / fascicle; nuclear lesions may be more complex | New acquired III palsy needs urgent assessment / imaging for compression. Pupil sparing does not safely exclude aneurysm. |
| IV palsy: vertical / torsional diplopia, worse looking down in adduction | Superior oblique pathway; usually ipsilateral peripheral IV | Look for hypertropia and compensatory head tilt. Skew deviation and myasthenia can mimic it. |
| VI palsy: one eye fails to abduct | Ipsilateral VI nerve / fascicle | VI palsy can be a false-localising sign of raised intracranial pressure. |
| INO: impaired adduction; abducting nystagmus in other eye | MLF on the side of the adduction deficit | Left eye fails to adduct on right gaze → left MLF. Convergence is often preserved; its loss does not exclude INO. |
| One-and-a-half: ipsilateral horizontal gaze palsy + INO | Ipsilateral pontine horizontal gaze centre / VI nucleus and MLF | Only the contralateral eye can abduct horizontally. Facial weakness may coexist. |
| Conjugate horizontal gaze palsy | Ipsilateral pontine gaze circuitry, or contralateral cerebral control | Destructive frontal lesion: eyes often towards lesion. Destructive pontine lesion: gaze often away from lesion. Seizures can reverse the cortical pattern. |
| Vertical gaze palsy | Rostral midbrain / associated thalamomesencephalic pathways | Look for impaired convergence, pupil abnormalities or impaired alertness. |
| Ptosis + miosis, anisocoria greater in dark | Ipsilateral sympathetic pathway: Horner syndrome | Central, preganglionic or postganglionic. Acute painful Horner → urgently assess for carotid dissection. |
[12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [40] [42] ↑ Back to lookup
| Ataxia pattern | Findings to seek | Likely system |
|---|---|---|
| Cerebellar | Dysmetria / decomposition, dysdiadochokinesia, cerebellar dysarthria or ocular signs; remains abnormal with eyes open | Limb findings usually ipsilateral hemisphere / connections; gait and truncal instability may indicate vermis or wider disease. |
| Sensory | Impaired joint position / vibration; pseudoathetosis; much worse with eyes closed | Large-fibre peripheral sensory pathway or dorsal columns. Check reflexes and a sensory level. |
| Vestibular | Vertigo, nausea, nystagmus, lateropulsion; limb coordination may be preserved | Peripheral labyrinth / vestibular nerve or central vestibular pathways. Use timing, triggers and examination together. |
PICA (posterior inferior cerebellar): inferior cerebellum; vertigo, gait / truncal instability ± lateral medullary signs. AICA (anterior inferior): cerebellar / lateral pontine pattern; auditory and facial findings help. SCA (superior): limb / gait ataxia and dysarthria. Territory patterns overlap; none of these signs determines the artery by itself.
A sensory level and face-sparing long-tract signs favour cord disease. Check upper limbs even when the complaint is in the legs. The skin sensory level may lie below the structural lesion; cord segment and vertebral level are different.
Left hemicord pattern: left weakness + left position / vibration loss, with right pain / temperature loss below. The sensory level may lag the lesion by several segments; complete textbook patterns are uncommon.
ClinicalReference schematic. Anatomy: [22] [23] [24]. Simplified for bedside lookup.
Posterior is at the top. Find the dorsal columns, lateral corticospinal tract and anterolateral system. This is a teaching cross-section, not a patient MRI or a precise segment-specific boundary map.
Polarlys and Mikael Häggström; English translation by Selket. Original / source. CC BY-SA 3.0. Resized / rendered for display; anatomical content unchanged.
| Pattern | Expected findings | Bedside implication / caveat |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical myelopathy | Hand clumsiness ± segmental arm wasting / reduced reflexes, with brisk legs, extensor plantars and gait disturbance | Coexisting radiculopathy / neuropathy can mask reflex changes. No facial signs from an isolated cervical lesion. |
| Thoracic cord | Paraparesis, trunk sensory level and possible sphincter dysfunction; arms spared | A normal upper-limb examination helps distinguish from cervical disease; imaging level cannot be read exactly from skin level. |
| Hemicord / Brown-Séquard | Ipsilateral weakness and position / vibration loss; contralateral pain–temperature loss below lesion | Real lesions are often partial. At-level root / segmental findings may coexist. |
| Anterior cord | Bilateral motor and pain–temperature impairment; relative preservation of vibration / position | Consider infarction or compression in the clinical setting; the pattern does not identify the cause. |
| Central cervical cord / syrinx | Central cord injury: arms often weaker than legs. Syrinx: segmental bilateral pain–temperature loss ± hand LMN signs | These are related anatomical patterns with different clinical settings; do not equate every central cord lesion with a syrinx. |
| Conus medullaris | Saddle sensory and early bladder / bowel / sexual dysfunction; often bilateral; mixed UMN / LMN features possible | Often around L1–L2 vertebral region in adults. Symptoms overlap cauda equina. |
| Cauda equina | Root pain, asymmetric or bilateral flaccid weakness, reduced reflexes, saddle / sphincter disturbance | A root syndrome below the cord. New urinary sensation / voiding change matters before complete retention. Do not wait for every classic sign. |
New perineal or bladder / bowel changes, a sensory level, rapidly worsening weakness, or severe spinal pain with infection / cancer / bleeding risk need urgent escalation and an MRI plan. Normal anal tone or a reassuring bladder measurement alone must not close the diagnosis.
Approximate sensory landmarks: T4 nipple line; T10 umbilicus; L1 groin; S2 posterior thigh; S3–5 saddle / perianal region. Dermatomes overlap. In acute cord injury, spinal shock can initially suppress reflexes and tone.
These are practical root contributions, not exclusive wiring. Confirm a suspected root using several muscles supplied by different peripheral nerves, sensation and reflexes. A normal single muscle does not exclude radiculopathy.
Dermatomes overlap and published maps differ. Use this with the movement / reflex table, not as an exact border test. “Th” means thoracic (T). A dermatome is different from a named peripheral nerve’s cutaneous field.
Ralf Stephan. Original / source. Public domain. Rendered for display; anatomical content unchanged.
| Root | Useful movement / muscle | Sensory clue | Reflex |
|---|---|---|---|
| C5 | Shoulder abduction (deltoid / axillary); elbow flexion (biceps / musculocutaneous, C5–6) | Lateral upper arm | Biceps C5–6 |
| C6 | Wrist extension (radial, C6–7); elbow flexion / brachioradialis | Thumb / lateral forearm | Brachioradialis C5–6, mainly C6 |
| C7 | Elbow extension (triceps / radial); wrist flexion and pronation (median / ulnar contributions) | Middle finger | Triceps C7–8, mainly C7 |
| C8 | Distal finger flexion (median + ulnar); thumb interphalangeal flexion (median / AIN) | Little finger / ulnar hand | No dependable routine reflex |
| T1 | Finger abduction / adduction (interossei / ulnar; C8–T1); compare median-innervated thenar muscles | Medial forearm | No routine reflex |
| L2–3 | Hip flexion (iliopsoas, L1–3); hip adduction (obturator, L2–4) | Anterior thigh / medial knee | Knee L3–4 |
| L3–4 | Knee extension (quadriceps / femoral); L4 also contributes ankle dorsiflexion | Medial knee / medial leg to medial malleolus | Knee L3–4, mainly L4 |
| L5 | Great-toe extension (deep fibular); inversion (tibialis posterior / tibial); hip abduction (superior gluteal) | Dorsum of foot / great toe | No reliable routine reflex; medial hamstring sometimes helpful |
| S1 | Plantarflexion (gastrocnemius–soleus / tibial); eversion (superficial fibular, L5–S1) | Lateral foot / sole | Achilles S1–2, mainly S1 |
Compare with the root map above. The medial forearm is supplied by the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve, so sensory loss there needs an explanation beyond an isolated ulnar lesion. Historical drawing; boundaries and root labels are approximate.
Gray’s Anatomy, Henry Vandyke Carter / Henry Gray; vectorised by Fred the Oyster, corrected by Mikael Häggström. Original / source. Public domain. Rendered for display; anatomical content unchanged.
| Nerve / site | Motor pattern | Sensory / distinguishing clue |
|---|---|---|
| Axillary | Deltoid weakness: shoulder abduction; teres minor may affect external rotation | Lateral shoulder patch. Compare biceps / supraspinatus to assess C5 / upper trunk. |
| Suprascapular | Supraspinatus / infraspinatus: initiation of abduction / external rotation | No cutaneous loss; spinoglenoid lesion may spare supraspinatus. |
| Long thoracic | Serratus anterior weakness; medial scapular winging, accentuated by wall push | Pure motor. Trapezius weakness / shoulder droop suggests accessory nerve instead. |
| Radial, upper arm / spiral groove | Wrist + finger / thumb extension weakness; triceps usually spared at spiral groove | Dorsal first web-space loss may occur. A more proximal lesion can affect triceps. |
| Posterior interosseous (PIN) | Finger / thumb extension weakness; wrist extension often retained with radial deviation | No cutaneous sensory loss. Extensor carpi radialis longus is supplied proximally. |
| Median at carpal tunnel | APB / opposition weakness in advanced disease | Lateral 3½ digits; thenar eminence sensation usually spared (palmar cutaneous branch bypasses tunnel). |
| Anterior interosseous (AIN) | Weak thumb IP and index DIP flexion → abnormal tip-to-tip “OK” pinch | Pure motor; no cutaneous loss. Tendon injury can mimic this. |
| Ulnar, elbow versus wrist | Interossei / ADM / adductor pollicis weakness; finger abduction and key pinch affected | Little finger / ulnar half ring finger. Dorsal ulnar hand loss supports lesion proximal to Guyon canal. Forearm ulnar muscles may be spared even at elbow. |
The first dorsal web space helps assess deep fibular sensation; the sole tests tibial branches. Sensory overlap limits any single point. For foot drop, add inversion and hip abduction to distinguish common fibular from L5 patterns.
ClinicalReference schematic. Anatomy: [34] [35] [36]. Simplified for bedside lookup.
| Nerve / site | Motor pattern | Sensory / distinguishing clue |
|---|---|---|
| Common fibular at fibular neck | Weak dorsiflexion, toe extension and eversion; inversion relatively preserved | Anterolateral lower leg / dorsum foot; sole spared. Deep branch: first dorsal web space. |
| Tibial, proximal | Weak plantarflexion, toe flexion and tibialis-posterior inversion; reduced Achilles may occur | Sole sensory loss. Tarsal tunnel is distal and should spare calf power / Achilles. |
| Sciatic | Fibular division often worse: foot drop ± tibial weakness; hamstrings may be affected | Much of foot / lateral leg; medial leg (saphenous) relatively spared. Hip abduction suggests a site above isolated sciatic nerve. |
| Femoral | Knee extension weakness; reduced knee reflex; hip flexion may be affected depending on level | Anterior thigh / medial leg. Preserved adduction favours femoral over L2–4 root / lumbar plexus, but is not absolute. |
| Obturator | Hip adduction weakness | Small / variable medial-thigh sensory patch; compare quadriceps for plexus / root involvement. |
| Lateral femoral cutaneous | No motor deficit or reflex change | Anterolateral thigh sensory symptoms only: meralgia paraesthetica. Weakness requires another explanation. |
[20] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] ↑ Back to lookup
| Presentation | Compare these sites | Highest-yield extra examination |
|---|---|---|
| Foot drop | Common fibular ↔ L5 root ↔ sciatic / plexus ↔ central | Test inversion and hip abduction. Both can be weak in L5; should be spared in an isolated common fibular lesion. Add plantarflexion / hamstrings for sciatic involvement and plantar responses for central disease. |
| Wrist drop | Radial ↔ C7 ↔ cortical hand area | Test pronation and wrist flexion. Weakness outside radial muscles supports C7. Sensory loss at middle finger supports C7; first dorsal web space supports radial. Sudden onset still warrants a central assessment. |
| Ulnar-looking weak hand | Ulnar ↔ C8/T1 root ↔ lower trunk | Test median APB / thumb IP flexion, medial forearm sensation and dorsal ulnar hand sensation. Weakness across median + ulnar muscles points proximal to an isolated ulnar lesion. |
| Weak quadriceps | Femoral ↔ L3/4 root ↔ lumbar plexus | Test hip adduction (obturator) and ankle dorsiflexion. Knee reflex / medial-leg sensation can be abnormal in either femoral or L4 disease. |
| Bilateral weak legs | Cord ↔ cauda / polyradiculopathy ↔ neuropathy / muscle | Check a trunk level, plantars, perineal / bladder symptoms and arms. Acute cord disease may lack brisk reflexes. New sphincter symptoms require urgent escalation. |
Radiculopathy is usually proximal to the dorsal-root ganglion, so distal sensory responses are often preserved; a plexus / peripheral nerve lesion may reduce the relevant sensory responses. Paraspinal denervation supports root involvement but is not sufficient alone. Early or purely sensory radiculopathy can have a normal study. Choose timing and muscle sampling with neurophysiology; do not delay urgent imaging for EMG.
“There is [distribution] weakness / sensory loss with [two positive localising findings]. This favours [side and anatomical level]. [Alternative site] remains possible because [specific uncertainty]. I would distinguish them by [targeted examination / imaging].”
Document what you actually found, including pain, fatigue, attention, language or cooperation limiting the examination. If localisation remains unclear, say which two sites remain plausible and what you need to discriminate them.